US Approves Use Of American-Supplied Weapons By Ukraine

President Joe Biden faces a pivotal decision in the Ukraine conflict: whether to lift the ban on using American-supplied weapons against Russian territory. Concerns about potential escalation with a nuclear-armed Russia have long influenced Biden’s cautious stance. However, mounting pressure from allies and his administration is prompting a reassessment.

(Also read Jury delivers guilty verdict on all 34 counts against Trump in hush-money trial.)

Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently hinted at a possible policy shift, acknowledging the need to adapt to changing battlefield conditions. Blinken’s comments followed reports from Kyiv indicating that Ukrainian forces might struggle to hold territory near Kharkiv without targeting Russian artillery and missile sites just across the border.

Debate Grows Over Ukraine’s Use of American-Supplied Weapons for Strikes in Russia

Allied leaders, including NATO’s Jens Stoltenberg and officials from France and Germany, have echoed calls for greater flexibility. They argue that preventing Ukraine from attacking legitimate military targets within Russia hampers its defence efforts. While the U.K. already permits its weapons to be used against Russian targets, Biden’s decision remains pending.

The president’s national security team is swiftly developing a formal recommendation. Although any policy change would likely come with restrictions to limit strikes to military targets near the border, Biden aims to balance avoiding a direct U.S.-Russia confrontation with preventing Ukrainian defeat.

The Kremlin continues to issue nuclear threats, but U.S. officials downplay them as strategic posturing. Analysts argue that fears of escalation are overstated, noting the absence of retaliation against countries whose weapons Ukraine has already employed in Russia.

As Biden prepares for crucial meetings with global leaders, his decision could reshape the conflict and U.S. strategy.